Smith v. Long
172 F. App'x 700
This text of 172 F. App'x 700 (Smith v. Long) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith v. Long, 172 F. App'x 700 (8th Cir. 2006).
Opinion
Stanley Paul Smith submitted a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint with an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). The district court1 denied Smith IFP status, he paid the filing fee, and the complaint was filed and is currently pending in the district court. We therefore dismiss this appeal as premature. See 8th Cir. R. [702]*70247A(a). We also deny Smith’s pending motions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jurisdiction, powers, and temporary assignment
28 U.S.C. § 636(c)
Civil action for deprivation of rights
42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
172 F. App'x 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-long-ca8-2006.