Smith v. Listman

175 A.D. 960, 161 N.Y.S. 1146, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8871

This text of 175 A.D. 960 (Smith v. Listman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Listman, 175 A.D. 960, 161 N.Y.S. 1146, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8871 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs. AH concurred, except Howard, J., who dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 A.D. 960, 161 N.Y.S. 1146, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-listman-nyappdiv-1916.