Smith v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.
119 S.E. 926, 186 N.C. 774, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 350
This text of 119 S.E. 926 (Smith v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co., 119 S.E. 926, 186 N.C. 774, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 350 (N.C. 1923).
Opinion
The evidence bearing upon the defendants’ alleged negligence was conflicting, but the jury has accepted the defendants’ version of the matter and answered the issue against the plaintiff. We have found no substantial or prejudicial error in the trial; hence the verdict and judgment as rendered will be upheld.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
119 S.E. 926, 186 N.C. 774, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-liggett-myers-tobacco-co-nc-1923.