Smith v. Life & Casualty Insurance
This text of 196 S.E. 59 (Smith v. Life & Casualty Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
In view of the prayer for cancellation and the allegations of the petition in reference thereto, the Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction of the subject-matter, and the Court of Appeals properly transmitted this writ of error to the Supreme Court.
The evidence was sufficient to show that the insured was killed by being struck by a motor vehicle while he was walking or standing on a public highway, within the terms of the policy. The fact that he may have been negligent in grabbing at the truck did not relieve the insurance company from liability where he “missed it in some way and fell under the rear wheel,” which then ran over his body and caused the injuries from which he died. Under the contract, the negligence of the insured was immaterial. The court erred in granting a nonsuit.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
196 S.E. 59, 185 Ga. 572, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-life-casualty-insurance-ga-1938.