Smith v. Life & Casualty Insurance

196 S.E. 59, 185 Ga. 572, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 491
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 14, 1938·No. No. 12121·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

Russell, Chief Justice.

In view of the prayer for cancellation and the allegations of the petition in reference thereto, the Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction of the subject-matter, and the Court of Appeals properly transmitted this writ of error to the Supreme Court.

The evidence was sufficient to show that the insured was killed by being struck by a motor vehicle while he was walking or standing on a public highway, within the terms of the policy. The fact that he may have been negligent in grabbing at the truck did not relieve the insurance company from liability where he “missed it in some way and fell under the rear wheel,” which then ran over his body and caused the injuries from which he died. Under the contract, the negligence of the insured was immaterial. The court erred in granting a nonsuit.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Life & Casualty Insurance, 196 S.E. 59, 185 Ga. 572, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 491 (Ga. 1938).

196 S.E. 59 (Smith v. Life & Casualty Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Family Life Insurance v. Robinson
154 S.E.2d 763 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
Bacon v. Life & Casualty Insurance Co. of Tennessee
121 A.2d 724 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1956)
Davis v. Combined Insurance Co. of America
70 S.E.2d 814 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1952)
Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tenn. v. Kinney
177 S.W.2d 768 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1944)
Life & Casualty Ins. v. Greenlee
192 So. 340 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1939)