Smith v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

77 A.D. 47, 80 N.Y.S. 390
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Lehigh Valley Railroad. Read the opinion of the Court — 77 A.D. 43
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 1, 1902·No. No. 2·Published

Opinion

Williams, J.:

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

In order to authorize the granting of an extra allowance, a case must be both difficult and extraordinary. (Code Civ. Proc. § 3253.)

While a railroad crossing accident case may be difficult and require much labor and expense in the trial, such a case cannot be said, in any sense, to be extraordinary. Cases of this kind are very common. Our courts are continually trying them and reviewing them on appeal.

Extra allowances should not be granted in these cases, unless they come clearly within the provisions of the statute.

The verdicts are ordinarily large enough, and create a sufficient burden upon the railroads, without granting extra allowances. In this case the plaintiff is adequately compensated in the verdict and the statutory costs.

The order should, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

McLennan, Spring and Hiscook, JJ., concurred; Davt, J., not sitting.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Lehigh Valley Railroad, 77 A.D. 47, 80 N.Y.S. 390 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1902).

77 A.D. 47 (Smith v. Lehigh Valley Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.