Smith v. Lehfeldt

California Court of Appeal

Smith v. Lehfeldt

179 P. 724, 39 Cal. App. 791, 1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 215

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 8, 1919

DocketCiv. No. 2696

StatusPublished

This text of 179 P. 724 (Smith v. Lehfeldt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Lehfeldt, 179 P. 724, 39 Cal. App. 791, 1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 215 (Cal. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

It is stipulated that in all substantial respects the record is the same in this case as in the ease of Bonner v. Lehfeldt, ante, p. 649, [179 Pac. 722].

It is further stipulated that “the appeal in this case be heard upon the papers set out in this stipulation and the record contained in the transcript on appeal in the case of Bonner v. Lehfeldt.” [1] On the authority of that case, the order appealed from must be reversed.

The order is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

It is stipulated that in all substantial respects the record is the same in this case as in the ease of Bonner v. Lehfeldt, ante, p. 649, [179 Pac. 722].

It is further stipulated that “the appeal in this case be heard upon the papers set out in this stipulation and the record contained in the transcript on appeal in the case of Bonner v. Lehfeldt.” [1] On the authority of that case, the order appealed from must be reversed.

The order is reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 P. 724, 39 Cal. App. 791, 1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-lehfeldt-calctapp-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack