Smith v. Leh-Feldt

California Court of Appeal

Smith v. Leh-Feldt

179 P. 724, 39 Cal. App. 791

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 8, 1919

DocketCiv. No. 2696.

StatusPublished

This text of 179 P. 724 (Smith v. Leh-Feldt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Leh-Feldt, 179 P. 724, 39 Cal. App. 791 (Cal. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

It is stipulated that in all substantial respects the record is the same in this case as in the case ofBonner v. Lehfeldt, ante, p. 649, [179 P. 722].

It is further stipulated that "the appeal in this case be heard upon the papers set out in this stipulation and the record contained in the transcript on appeal in the case ofBonner v. Lehfeldt." [1] On the authority of that case, the order appealed from must be reversed.

The order is reversed.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is stipulated that in all substantial respects the record is the same in this case as in the case ofBonner v. Lehfeldt, ante, p. 649, [179 P. 722].

It is further stipulated that "the appeal in this case be heard upon the papers set out in this stipulation and the record contained in the transcript on appeal in the case ofBonner v. Lehfeldt." [1] On the authority of that case, the order appealed from must be reversed.

The order is reversed.

*Page 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 P. 724, 39 Cal. App. 791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-leh-feldt-calctapp-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack