Smith v. Lee & Co.
82 Ga. 674
Opinion
Lee & Co. recovered against Smith a verdict for $191. We have read all the evidence, and our conclusion is that the recovery, if not precisely correct, was rather less than it should have been. • The court committed no error in refusing to grant a new trial. There is no legal principle involved in the case, and a more extended discussion would be useless.
Judgment affirmed. •
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Lee & Co., 82 Ga. 674 (Ga. 1889).
82 Ga. 674 (Smith v. Lee & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johns v. League, Duvall & Powell Inc.
45 S.E.2d 211 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Blair-Parke Coal & Coke Co. v. Fiedler-Davis Fuel Co.
127 S.E. 81 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1925)
Tou Velle v. Farm Bureau Co-op. Exchange
229 P. 83 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1924)
McKenzie v. Patterson
109 S.E. 174 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)