Smith v. Ledford

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7169

HAROLD SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN D. LEDFORD, Sheriff; JAMES HARWOOD, Captain; DENNY GOFORTH, Chief Deputy; EDDIE RICE, Jail Administrator,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-00152)

Submitted: October 17, 2006 Decided: October 24, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harold Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Harold Smith appeals the district court’s orders denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Smith v. Ledford, No. 1:06-cv-00152

(W.D.N.C. May 22, 2006, June 19, 2006). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -