Smith v. Leavensworth

1 Root 209
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided August 15, 1790·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

Tbis action is not for tbe warrant, but to recover damages for tbe breach of contract, in not delivering tbe warrant; wbicb could not happen until tbe warrant bad been demanded. Dean v. Woodbridge, determined at Norwich, last March term, is in point.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Leavensworth, 1 Root 209 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).

1 Root 209 (Smith v. Leavensworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Counsel v. Vulture Mining Company of Arizona
5 Daly 74 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1874)
Lobdell v. Hopkins
5 Cow. 516 (New York Supreme Court, 1826)