Home/Connecticut Superior Court/Smith v. Leavensworth

Smith v. Leavensworth

1 Root 209
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1790
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Root 209 (Smith v. Leavensworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Leavensworth, 1 Root 209 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).

Opinion

By the Court.

Tbis action is not for tbe warrant, but to recover damages for tbe breach of contract, in not delivering tbe warrant; wbicb could not happen until tbe warrant bad been demanded. Dean v. Woodbridge, determined at Norwich, last March term, is in point.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Counsel v. Vulture Mining Company of Arizona
5 Daly 74 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1874)
Lobdell v. Hopkins
5 Cow. 516 (New York Supreme Court, 1826)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Root 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-leavensworth-connsuperct-1790.