Smith v. Lattimore Materials

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 8, 2003
Docket03-40626
StatusUnpublished

This text of Smith v. Lattimore Materials (Smith v. Lattimore Materials) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Lattimore Materials, (5th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D October 8, 2003 In the United States Court of Appeals Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk for the Fifth Circuit _______________

m 03-40626 Summary Calendar _______________

KENNETH J. SMITH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

LATTIMORE MATERIALS,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas m 4:02-CV-27 _________________________

Before SMITH, DEMOSS, and istrate judge to whom the matter was referred STEWART, Circuit Judges. by consent granted summary judgment for Lattimore. Smith appeals pro se. PER CURIAM:* There is no basis for recovery under the Kenneth Smith, pro se, sued Lattimore ADA. The magistrate judge explained why in Materials for violation of the ADA. The mag- a comprehensive and persuasive order dated March 24, 2003, and entered on March 25, 2003. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has de- termined that this opinion should not be published The judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially and is not precedent except under the limited cir- for the reasons given by the magistrate judge. cumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Smith v. Lattimore Materials, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-lattimore-materials-ca5-2003.