Smith v. Kolb

58 Ala. 645
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 15, 1877·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

MANNING, J.

1. Although, in regard to civil remedies, laws may be enacted which shall have a retroactive operation, the general rule is that they are not to be construed to produce that effect, unless it was manifestly the purpose of the legislature that they should. — Barnes v. Mobile, 19 Ala. 707; Kidd v. Montague, Ib. 624.

2. Such a construction can not be put on the act of April [647]*64719th, 1873, “ to amend sections 3101, 3102 and 3104 of the Bevised Code,” in relation to mechanic’s liens. And appellant not having acquired any such lien on the property, concerning which this suit was brought, none was created in his favor by the enactment, subsequently, of the act referred to. The property, therefore, can not be charged, in the hands of the subsequent purchaser, with the payment of the sum due to plaintiff for his services in erecting the building thereon.

Let the decree of the Chancellor be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Kolb, 58 Ala. 645 (Ala. 1877).

58 Ala. 645 (Smith v. Kolb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Board of Revenue of Jefferson County v. Hewitt
90 So. 781 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1921)
National Union v. Sherry
61 So. 944 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1913)
Duy v. Alabama Western Railway Co.
57 So. 724 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1911)
Dickens v. Dickens
56 So. 806 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1911)
Leahart v. Deedmeyer
48 So. 371 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1909)