Smith v. Knights Collision Experts Inc.
This text of Smith v. Knights Collision Experts Inc. (Smith v. Knights Collision Experts Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
Knights Collision Experts Inc., Defendant-Respondent.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Verna L. Saunders, J.), entered November 16, 2016, which granted defendant's motion to dismiss the action at the close of plaintiff's case.
Per Curiam.
Judgment (Verna L. Saunders, J.), entered November 16, 2016, affirmed, without costs.
The trial court correctly dismissed the action at the close of plaintiff's case. Even affording plaintiff every favorable inference that reasonably could be drawn from the evidence adduced at trial (see Szczerbiak v Pilat, 90 NY2d 553, 556 [1997]), we agree that he failed to establish a prima facie case against defendant for alleged property damage to his vehicle. Despite being given ample opportunity to do so, plaintiff failed to present any competent evidence to establish that he owned the vehicle at issue or expended any monies for repairs.
We also take judicial notice of the fact that, subsequent to the entry of the judgment appealed from, plaintiff obtained a $2,726.99 recovery against the City of New York for the damages to the vehicle at issue in this case.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: December 05, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Smith v. Knights Collision Experts Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-knights-collision-experts-inc-nyappterm-2018.