Smith v. Kitchen Lumber Co.

198 N.C. 736
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 28, 1930·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Stacy, O. J.,

after, stating tbe case: Considering tbat it is as much tbe duty of tbe master to exercise care in providing the servant with reasonably safe means and methods of work, such as proper assistants for performing bis task, as it is to furnish him a safe place and proper tools and appliances, we see no distinguishing difference in principle between tbe instant case and Bradford v. English, 190 N. C., 742, 130 S. E., 705, and Pigford v. R. R., 160 N. C., 93, 75 S. E., 860. Tbe judgment of nonsuit, therefore, entered herein, will be reversed on authority of these recent decisions.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Kitchen Lumber Co., 198 N.C. 736 (N.C. 1930).

198 N.C. 736 (Smith v. Kitchen Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Christie v. Great Northern Railway Co.
20 P.2d 377 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1933)