Smith v. . Kingston City Railroad Company
62 N.E. 1100, 169 N.Y. 616
Opinion
We think that the case was properly submitted to the jury upon both theories of. negligence on the *617 part of the defendant, the one relating to improper construction and the other to negligent operation of the car.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Parker, Oh. J., Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. . Kingston City Railroad Company, 62 N.E. 1100, 169 N.Y. 616 (N.Y. 1902).
62 N.E. 1100 (Smith v. . Kingston City Railroad Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
P. N. Gray & Co. v. Cavalliotis
276 F. 565 (E.D. New York, 1921)