Smith v. . Kingston City Railroad Company

New York Court of Appeals

Smith v. . Kingston City Railroad Company

62 N.E. 1100, 169 N.Y. 616

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 31, 1902

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 62 N.E. 1100 (Smith v. . Kingston City Railroad Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. . Kingston City Railroad Company, 62 N.E. 1100, 169 N.Y. 616 (N.Y. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think that the case was properly submitted to the jury upon both theories of. negligence on the *617 part of the defendant, the one relating to improper construction and the other to negligent operation of the car.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Parker, Oh. J., Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI