Smith v. Kingsboro Psychiatric Center

35 A.D.3d 751, 828 N.Y.S.2d 419
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 19, 2006
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 35 A.D.3d 751 (Smith v. Kingsboro Psychiatric Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Kingsboro Psychiatric Center, 35 A.D.3d 751, 828 N.Y.S.2d 419 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Kingsboro Psychiatric Center (KPC) dated June 22, 2004, terminating the petitioner’s probationary employment, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bunyan, J.), dated February 28, 2005, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner applied for a position with the respondent Kingsboro Psychiatric Center (KPC) (hereinafter referred to as KPC). On his employment application, the petitioner answered in the affirmative that he had been convicted of a crime, but disclosed only one of his eight convictions. Two months after the petitioner began his employment, and within his probationary period, KPC discovered the full extent of his criminal record and terminated his employment for falsifying the employment application.

A court’s review of a determination to terminate a probationary employee is limited to consideration of whether the dismissal was in bad faith, in violation of statutory or decisional law, or for unconstitutional or illegal reasons (see Matter of Hernandez v City of White Plains, 301 AD2d 523, 524 [2003]; [752]*752see also Matter of Swinton v Safir, 93 NY2d 758, 763 [1999]). Unless one or more of these conditions is present, a probationary employee may be terminated without a hearing or a statement of reasons (see Matter of Johnson v Katz, 68 NY2d 649, 650 [1986]; Matter of York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, 761 [1984]; Matter of Hernandez v City of White Plains, supra, 301 AD2d at 524; Matter of Green v Board of Educ. of City Dist. of N.Y., 262 AD2d 411 [1999]; Matter of Williams v Commissioner of Off. of Mental Health of State of N.Y., 259 AD2d 623 [1999]).

The petitioner contends that his employment was terminated because of his criminal record, in violation of Correction Law § 752. Contrary to the petitioner’s contentions, however, the termination of his employment based upon his failure to disclose his criminal record completely and truthfully does not implicate that provision (see Matter of Lagarenne v Leake, 243 AD2d 258, 259 [1997]; Matter of Stewart v Civil Serv. Commn. of City of N.Y., 84 AD2d 491, 494 [1982]). Moreover, the Supreme Court correctly concluded that the record provided a rational basis for KPC’s finding that the petitioner had falsified his application and its decision to terminate the petitioner’s employment on that basis (see Matter of Shraeder v Kern, 287 NY 13, 14 [1941]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.E, Mastro, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Messenger v. State of New York Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision
2017 NY Slip Op 5145 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Nieblas-Love v. New York City Housing Authority
165 F. Supp. 3d 51 (S.D. New York, 2016)
Noble v. Career Education Corp.
375 F. App'x 102 (Second Circuit, 2010)
Russell v. New York Citywide Administrative Services
55 A.D.3d 614 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Browne v. City of New York
45 A.D.3d 590 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 A.D.3d 751, 828 N.Y.S.2d 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-kingsboro-psychiatric-center-nyappdiv-2006.