Smith v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Smith v. King

103 A.D.2d 827, 477 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19464

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 23, 1984·Published

Opinion

— In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Green, J.), dated December 3, 1982, as granted that branch of respondents’ motion which sought to set aside a jury verdict on the issue of damages, unless plaintiff stipulated to a reduction in damages to the principal sum of $100,000. 11 Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. 11 There was a sound basis for the reduction of the verdict and the Trial Judge properly exercised his discretion. Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Green, J.), dated December 3, 1982, as granted that branch of respondents’ motion which sought to set aside a jury verdict on the issue of damages, unless plaintiff stipulated to a reduction in damages to the principal sum of $100,000. 11 Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. 11 There was a sound basis for the reduction of the verdict and the Trial Judge properly exercised his discretion. Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Smith v. King, 103 A.D.2d 827, 477 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19464 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

103 A.D.2d 827 (Smith v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.