Smith v. Kentucky
275 U.S. 509, 48 S. Ct. 158, 72 L. Ed. 398, 1927 U.S. LEXIS 341
Opinion
Affirmed on the authority of Adams v. City of Milwaukee, 228 U. S. 572, 581, 583; Laurel Hill Cemetery v. City and County of San Francisco, 216 U. S. 358, 365, 366; Dominion Hotel v. Arizona, 249 U. S. 265, 268, 269; Radice v. New York, 264 U. S. 292, 296, 297.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Kentucky, 275 U.S. 509, 48 S. Ct. 158, 72 L. Ed. 398, 1927 U.S. LEXIS 341 (1927).
275 U.S. 509 (Smith v. Kentucky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners v. Reiner
786 P.2d 499 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1989)
Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. v. City & County of Denver
737 P.2d 822 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1987)
Elec. Power Res. v. CITY & CTY. OF DENVER
737 P.2d 822 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1987)
Pueblo of Santa Ana v. Hodel
663 F. Supp. 1300 (District of Columbia, 1987)
Atlantic City Racing Ass'n v. Attorney General
489 A.2d 165 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1985)
Genda v. Superior Court, County of Pima
439 P.2d 811 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1968)
State v. Superior Court in and for County of Maricopa
390 P.2d 109 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1964)
People v. Sullivan
141 P.2d 230 (California Court of Appeal, 1943)
Laisne v. California State Board of Optometry
123 P.2d 457 (California Supreme Court, 1942)
In Re McKelvey
64 P.2d 1002 (California Court of Appeal, 1937)
Louisiana Greyhound Club, Inc. v. Clancy
280 U.S. 525 (Supreme Court, 1929)