Smith v. . Kellogg
88 N.E. 1129, 194 N.Y. 567, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1394
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, IIiscock and Chase, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. . Kellogg, 88 N.E. 1129, 194 N.Y. 567, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1394 (N.Y. 1909).
88 N.E. 1129 (Smith v. . Kellogg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bielaski v. Fordham Nat. Bank
14 F. Supp. 971 (S.D. New York, 1935)
Sanders v. Wonderland Amusement Co.
172 A.D. 713 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)