Smith v. Kafin

140 F. Supp. 595, 1956 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3564
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 24, 1956
DocketCiv. A. No. 16105
StatusPublished

This text of 140 F. Supp. 595 (Smith v. Kafin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Kafin, 140 F. Supp. 595, 1956 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3564 (E.D. Pa. 1956).

Opinion

GRIM, District Judge.

Plaintiffs filed a complaint November 30, 1953, against the defendant for treble damages for rent overcharges under Section 205 of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 1881 et seq.

Defendant moves to dismiss for want of jurisdiction, because the amount in controversy is less than $3,000, citing Fields v. Washington, 3 Cir., 1949, 173 F.2d 701.

Sec. 205 of the Act was amended July 31, 1951, c. 275, Public Law 96, to provide, “(c) Suit * * * may be brought in any Federal court of competent jurisdiction regardless of the amount involved » * * ”

Defendant’s motion is therefore denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fields v. Washington
173 F.2d 701 (Third Circuit, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 F. Supp. 595, 1956 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-kafin-paed-1956.