Smith v. Julius Weidner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Smith v. Julius Weidner

157 A. 25, 102 Pa. Super. 417, 1931 Pa. Super. LEXIS 192

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 5, 1931

DocketAppeal 105

StatusPublished

This text of 157 A. 25 (Smith v. Julius Weidner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Julius Weidner, 157 A. 25, 102 Pa. Super. 417, 1931 Pa. Super. LEXIS 192 (Pa. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Dbew, J.,

Appellee was injured in the same accident which gave rise to the case of Mooney v. Weidner, No. 106 April Term, 1931, in which an opinion has been filed this day. For the reasons there expressed we conclude that appellee herein was an employee of appellant at the time of injury and not an independent contractor and that he is therefore entitled to compensation.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Dbew, J.,

Appellee was injured in the same accident which gave rise to the case of Mooney v. Weidner, No. 106 April Term, 1931, in which an opinion has been filed this day. For the reasons there expressed we conclude that appellee herein was an employee of appellant at the time of injury and not an independent contractor and that he is therefore entitled to compensation.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 A. 25, 102 Pa. Super. 417, 1931 Pa. Super. LEXIS 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-julius-weidner-pasuperct-1931.