Smith v. Judges of the Court of Common Pleas
3 Cow. 27
This text of 3 Cow. 27 (Smith v. Judges of the Court of Common Pleas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith v. Judges of the Court of Common Pleas, 3 Cow. 27 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).
Opinion
The Court had no jurisdiction of the cause, and could not proceed til! after the procedendo filed. Of course, there could have been no regular notice of trial. The proceedings of the Court below were, for this reason, irregular, and the motion must be granted.
Rule for a mandamus.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Herndon v. Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Board Of Education
89 F.3d 174 (Fourth Circuit, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Cow. 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-judges-of-the-court-of-common-pleas-nysupct-1824.