Smith v. Jordan

25 Ga. 687
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 15, 1858·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

By the Court

Benning, J.

delivering the opinion.

If Shepherd vs. Burhhalter, 13 Ga. R. 443, be right, both .the charge, and the refusal to charge, were wrong. We see no reason to doubt that case. It is the right of the judgment creditor, to sell whatever his judgment binds. This right would be impaired, if purchasers were not allowed a corresponding right to buy. This corresponding right to buy, purchasers would not have, if they were liable to be affected by a notice of other liens or claims inferior to the judgment

For the sake then, of the creditor, not of the purchaser, a notice to the purchaser in such a case as the present, can be ■of no effect.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Jordan, 25 Ga. 687 (Ga. 1858).

25 Ga. 687 (Smith v. Jordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
137 S.E.2d 718 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Brown v. Aaron
93 S.E. 258 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Hawkins v. Dannenberg Co.
234 F. 752 (S.D. Georgia, 1916)
Massey v. Hubbard
18 Fla. 688 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1882)
Wallace & Co. v. Campbell
54 Tex. 87 (Texas Supreme Court, 1880)
Grace v. Wade & Mains
45 Tex. 522 (Texas Supreme Court, 1876)
Atkinson v. Beall
33 Ga. 153 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1862)