Smith v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Texas

Smith v. Jones

331 S.W.3d 857, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 520, 2011 WL 228081

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 25, 2011·No. 05-11-00006-CV·Published

Opinion

OPINION

Opinion By

Chief Justice WRIGHT.

Before the Court is appellant Larry Smith’s motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant filed an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order denying his motion to dismiss for failure of the appellees to attach a certificate of merit to their petition against a professional engineer. See Tex. Civ. Prag. & Rem.Code Ann. § 150.002(a) & (f) (West Supp. 2010). In his motion, appellant explains that the trial court reconsidered its ruling and on January 11, 2011, signed an order dismissing the appellees’ claims against him. Accordingly, appellant asks that this appeal be dismissed.

We grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex.R.App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Opinion By

Chief Justice WRIGHT.

Before the Court is appellant Larry Smith’s motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant filed an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order denying his motion to dismiss for failure of the appellees to attach a certificate of merit to their petition against a professional engineer. See Tex. Civ. Prag. & Rem.Code Ann. § 150.002(a) & (f) (West Supp. 2010). In his motion, appellant explains that the trial court reconsidered its ruling and on January 11, 2011, signed an order dismissing the appellees’ claims against him. Accordingly, appellant asks that this appeal be dismissed.

We grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex.R.App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

Smith v. Jones, 331 S.W.3d 857, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 520, 2011 WL 228081 (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

331 S.W.3d 857 (Smith v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related