Smith v. Jones Bros.

102 S.E. 463, 25 Ga. App. 47, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 588
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 11, 1920
Docket10750
StatusPublished

This text of 102 S.E. 463 (Smith v. Jones Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Jones Bros., 102 S.E. 463, 25 Ga. App. 47, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 588 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Smith, J.

The evidence supported the verdict, and, there being no error of law committed, the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and, Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 S.E. 463, 25 Ga. App. 47, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-jones-bros-gactapp-1920.