Smith v. Johnson
151 N.W. 46, 35 S.D. 151, 1915 S.D. LEXIS 19
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 S.D. 563 →
Opinion
In the preparation of their brief herein, appellant’®' counsel were guilty of the same failures to comply with [152] the rules andl decisions of this court as were noted by this court in the opinion in Donahoe v. Adebar, 149 N. W. 175. Everything .said in such opinion in relation to the appellant’s brief would apply to the brief before us.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Johnson, 151 N.W. 46, 35 S.D. 151, 1915 S.D. LEXIS 19 (S.D. 1915).
151 N.W. 46 (Smith v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Donahoe v. Adebar
149 N.W. 175 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1914)