Smith v. Johnson

2013 Ohio 403, 985 N.E.2d 1265, 135 Ohio St. 3d 250
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 14, 2013
Docket2012-1747
StatusPublished

This text of 2013 Ohio 403 (Smith v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Johnson, 2013 Ohio 403, 985 N.E.2d 1265, 135 Ohio St. 3d 250 (Ohio 2013).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals granting the motion of appellee, Madison Correctional Institution Warden Rod B. Johnson, and dismissing the petition of appellant, James Smith, for a writ of habeas corpus. Smith’s claims of a speedy-trial violation and a defective jury-verdict form are not cognizable in habeas corpus, and he had an adequate remedy by appeal to raise them. See State ex rel. Hart v. Turner, 132 Ohio St.3d 479, 2012-Ohio-3305, 974 N.E.2d 87; State ex rel. Harsh v. Sheets, 132 Ohio St.3d 198, 2012-Ohio-2368, 970 *251 N.E.2d 926, ¶ 3; Smith v. Smith, 123 Ohio St.3d 145, 2009-Ohio-4691, 914 N.E.2d 1036.

James Smith, pro se. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and William H. Lamb, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Hart v. Turner
2012 Ohio 3305 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)
State ex rel. Harsh v. Sheets
2012 Ohio 2368 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)
Smith v. Smith
2009 Ohio 4691 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2013 Ohio 403, 985 N.E.2d 1265, 135 Ohio St. 3d 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-johnson-ohio-2013.