Smith v. Johnson

Indiana Supreme Court

Smith v. Johnson

13 Ind. 224

DecidedNovember 15, 1859

StatusPublished

This text of 13 Ind. 224 (Smith v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Johnson, 13 Ind. 224 (Ind. 1859).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think the judgment in this case must be reversed, and the cause remanded for a further trial, for [225]*225error in the Court below in refusing instructions to the jury. We think there was some evidence to which the instruetion refused might have been applicable; and the case is not so clear on the evidence as to authorize us to decide the case upon [it], regardless of the error of the Court above stated.

J. P. Usher, for the appellants. S. B. Gookins, for the appellee.

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We think the judgment in this case must be reversed, and the cause remanded for a further trial, for [225]*225error in the Court below in refusing instructions to the jury. We think there was some evidence to which the instruetion refused might have been applicable; and the case is not so clear on the evidence as to authorize us to decide the case upon [it], regardless of the error of the Court above stated.

J. P. Usher, for the appellants. S. B. Gookins, for the appellee.

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Ind. 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-johnson-ind-1859.