Smith v. Johnson
Opinion
Where land was levied upon, an obligee in a bond for title to the land, alleged to have been made to her by the plaintiff in fl. fa., with a portion of the purchase-money paid (the judgment upon which [213] the fi. fa. issued having been rendered after the execution of the alleged bond), had such an interest in the land as authorized the interposition of a statutory claim. See Wade v. Hamilton, 30 Ga. 450 (2); Wheeler v. Martin, 145 Ga. 164 (88 S. E. 951). The court, on the trial, erred in rejecting as evidence the alleged bond, and in directing a verdict for the plaintiff in fi. fa.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
99 S.E. 530 (Smith v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.