Smith v. Johnson

99 S.E. 530, 149 Ga. 212, 1919 Ga. LEXIS 199
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 14, 1919·No. No. 1393·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Where land was levied upon, an obligee in a bond for title to the land, alleged to have been made to her by the plaintiff in fl. fa., with a portion of the purchase-money paid (the judgment upon which [213] the fi. fa. issued having been rendered after the execution of the alleged bond), had such an interest in the land as authorized the interposition of a statutory claim. See Wade v. Hamilton, 30 Ga. 450 (2); Wheeler v. Martin, 145 Ga. 164 (88 S. E. 951). The court, on the trial, erred in rejecting as evidence the alleged bond, and in directing a verdict for the plaintiff in fi. fa.

No. 1393. June 14, 1919. Claim. Before Judge Wright. Floyd superior court. April 1, 1919. M. B. Eubanks, for plaintiff in error. C. I. Carey, contra.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Beck, P. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Johnson, 99 S.E. 530, 149 Ga. 212, 1919 Ga. LEXIS 199 (Ga. 1919).

99 S.E. 530 (Smith v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hope v. Glass
185 S.E. 803 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Bennett v. Green
119 S.E. 620 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1923)