Smith v. Johnson

282 So. 2d 178, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7536
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 18, 1973·No. No. 72-49·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sims v. Apperson Chemicals, Inc., Fla.App. 1st 1966, 185 So.2d 179; Restatement (Second), Torts § 314 (1965); 2 Harper and James, Torts §§ 18.1, 18.2, 18.6, 18.7 (1956). Cf. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Garland, Fla.App.1st 1972, 269 So.2d 708; Lydick v. Chance, Fla.App.2d 1968, 214 So.2d 885; Tuloma Gas Products Company v. Lehmberg, Tex.Civ.App. 1968, 430 S.W.2d 281.

MANN, C. J., and LILES and McNULTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Johnson, 282 So. 2d 178, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7536 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

282 So. 2d 178 (Smith v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shephard v. Azzarelli Construction Co.
294 So. 2d 667 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Smith v. Johnson
289 So. 2d 733 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)