Smith v. Johnson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Smith v. Johnson

282 So. 2d 178, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7536

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 18, 1973

DocketNo. 72-49

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 282 So. 2d 178 (Smith v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Johnson, 282 So. 2d 178, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7536 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sims v. Apperson Chemicals, Inc., Fla.App. 1st 1966, 185 So.2d 179; Restatement (Second), Torts § 314 (1965); 2 Harper and James, Torts §§ 18.1, 18.2, 18.6, 18.7 (1956). Cf. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Garland, Fla.App.1st 1972, 269 So.2d 708; Lydick v. Chance, Fla.App.2d 1968, 214 So.2d 885; Tuloma Gas Products Company v. Lehmberg, Tex.Civ.App. 1968, 430 S.W.2d 281.

MANN, C. J., and LILES and McNULTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sims v. Apperson Chemicals, Inc., Fla.App. 1st 1966, 185 So.2d 179; Restatement (Second), Torts § 314 (1965); 2 Harper and James, Torts §§ 18.1, 18.2, 18.6, 18.7 (1956). Cf. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Garland, Fla.App.1st 1972, 269 So.2d 708; Lydick v. Chance, Fla.App.2d 1968, 214 So.2d 885; Tuloma Gas Products Company v. Lehmberg, Tex.Civ.App. 1968, 430 S.W.2d 281.

MANN, C. J., and LILES and McNULTY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 So. 2d 178, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-johnson-fladistctapp-1973.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack