Smith v. Johnson

5 Del. 57
Superior Court of Delaware·Decided July 5, 1848·Published

Opinion

Mr. Huffington objected to the admissibility of the note under a declaration laying a promise to Smith and wife.

Mr. Bayard said the objection would be more proper in arrest of judgment. But he said the declaration was in the proper form, stating the making and delivery of the note to the wife, the obligation and consequent promise to pay husband and wife.

The plaintiff had a verdict, which —

The court, upon consideration, sustained, and gave judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Johnson, 5 Del. 57 (Del. Ct. App. 1848).

5 Del. 57 (Smith v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.