Smith v. J.C. Penney Co.

300 A.D.2d 466, 750 N.Y.S.2d 897
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 16, 2002·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kitson, J.), entered April 17, 2001, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against him, dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff failed to object to that part of the jury charge which he challenges on this appeal. Accordingly, he did not preserve this issue for appellate review (see CPLR 4017, 4110-b, 5501 [a] [3]; Surjnarine v Brathwaite, 290 AD2d 436; Cavuto v Lilledah, 161 AD2d 853). In any event, the plaintiff’s contention is without merit.

The plaintiff’s remaining contention is also without merit. Ritter, J.P., Friedmann, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. J.C. Penney Co., 300 A.D.2d 466, 750 N.Y.S.2d 897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

300 A.D.2d 466 (Smith v. J.C. Penney Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rockowitz v. Greenstein
11 A.D.3d 523 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Meade v. Hisler
306 A.D.2d 387 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)