Smith v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance
This text of 130 So. 2d 775 (Smith v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action is a companion suit and was consolidated with the case of Honeycutt v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Ins. Co. et al., 130 So.2d 770.
The facts of the case are fully set forth in the case of Honeycutt v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Ins. Co., supra.
Counsel for plaintiff has answered the appeal and asked that the award granted by the trial judge of $10,000 be increased. An examination of the cases of our appellate courts on quantum reveals that the award made by the trial judge was proper under the facts found in this case.
For the reasons assigned, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. Defendant, T. J. Stephens, as administrator of the Succession of Thomas Arthur Stephens, is to pay all costs of this suit.
Affirmed.
On Application for Rehearing.
En Banc. Rehearing denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
130 So. 2d 775, 1961 La. App. LEXIS 1142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-indiana-lumbermens-mutual-insurance-lactapp-1961.