Smith v. . Ijams

36 N.E. 343, 141 N.Y. 552, 1894 N.Y. LEXIS 1173
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 16, 1894·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Agree to affirm on the two grounds first mentioned in opinion of Barrett, J., below. *

All concur, except Bartlett, J., not sitting.

Judgment affirmed.

*

70 Hun, 155.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. . Ijams, 36 N.E. 343, 141 N.Y. 552, 1894 N.Y. LEXIS 1173 (N.Y. 1894).

36 N.E. 343 (Smith v. . Ijams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Macneal
174 Misc. 947 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1940)