Smith v. Idaho Quartz Mining Co.

California Supreme Court

Smith v. Idaho Quartz Mining Co.

11 P. 878, 2 Cal. Unrep. 681

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 12, 1886

DocketNo. 11,425

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 P. 878 (Smith v. Idaho Quartz Mining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Idaho Quartz Mining Co., 11 P. 878, 2 Cal. Unrep. 681 (Cal. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

By the COURT.

The court was justified by the evidence in finding that the plaintiff was not the owner of the premises upon which the wood and timber had been cut, and had no interest in the premises other than as security, and that he was not the owner of the wood and timber, and that the wood was cut by parties in the possession of the premises under a claim of title adverse to plaintiff. Under such circumstances, the alleged errors as to other matters are immaterial. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the COURT.

The court was justified by the evidence in finding that the plaintiff was not the owner of the premises upon which the wood and timber had been cut, and had no interest in the premises other than as security, and that he was not the owner of the wood and timber, and that the wood was cut by parties in the possession of the premises under a claim of title adverse to plaintiff. Under such circumstances, the alleged errors as to other matters are immaterial. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 P. 878, 2 Cal. Unrep. 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-idaho-quartz-mining-co-cal-1886.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack