Smith v. Houchens Industries

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1319

PAUL VERNON SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HOUCHENS INDUSTRIES, d/b/a Save-A-Lot,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (6:06-cv-03405-HFF)

Submitted: July 27, 2007 Decided: August 15, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Vernon Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Wade Edward Ballard, FORD & HARRISON, LLP, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Paul Vernon Smith seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s

report and recommendation. This court may exercise jurisdiction

only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.

R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S.

541 (1949). The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation Smith

seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable

interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -