Smith v. Home Depot USA, Inc.

912 So. 2d 344, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 15695, 2005 WL 2447858
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Home Depot USA, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2461
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 5, 2005·No. No. 3D03-2253·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Darien Smith appeals a final judgment entered in favor of Smith’s former employer, the employer’s insurance carrier, and the carrier’s servicing agents. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with the recent Florida Supreme Court decision in Aguilera v. Inservices, Inc., 905 So.2d 84 (Fla.2005)(holding that the worker’s compensation system does not provide immunity for intentional tor-tious conduct that occurs during the claims process). Accordingly, we withdraw this Court’s March 2, 2005 per curiam opinion and substitute this one in its stead.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Home Depot USA, Inc., 912 So. 2d 344, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 15695, 2005 WL 2447858 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

912 So. 2d 344 (Smith v. Home Depot USA, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aguilera v. Inservices, Inc.
905 So. 2d 84 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)