Smith v. Holifield

54 So. 84, 98 Miss. 649
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1910·Published

Opinion

Smith, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellee, by his bill filed in the court below, sought and obtained a temporary injunction restraining appellant from cutting timber alleged to be the property of appellee, and prayed for an accounting for the value of timber previously cut. By the decree of the court below, appealed from, this injunction was made perpetual, and a master appointed to ascertain and report to the court the amount of damages sustained by appellee by reason of the cutting of his timber. This is an interlocutory and not a final decree, and consequently, if an appeal lies therefrom, it must be taken within the time and in the manner provided by section 35 of the Code of 1906. Wilson v. Pugh, 61 Miss. 449; Barnard v. Gibson, 7 How. 650, 12 L. Ed. 857; Richmond v. Atwood, 52 Fed. 10, 17 L. R. A. 615.

This not having been done, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Holifield, 54 So. 84, 98 Miss. 649 (Mich. 1910).

54 So. 84 (Smith v. Holifield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barnard v. Gibson
48 U.S. 650 (Supreme Court, 1849)
Wilson v. Pugh
61 Miss. 449 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1884)
Richmond v. Atwood
52 F. 10 (First Circuit, 1892)