Smith v. Higinbotham
This text of 36 P. 336 (Smith v. Higinbotham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
This was an action by J. T. Smith to recover from Wm. P. Higinbotham $219.75, which was the [251]*251balance of an open deposit account in the defendant’s bank. Before this action was brought, Higinbotham made an assignment for the benefit of his creditors, and the plaintiff, Smith, joined the other creditors in electing a permanent assignee. After that time he presented his claim for the debt mentioned to the assignee, and the same was allowed. From this allowance no appeal was taken, but no part of the allowance has ever been paid. The question presented for decision is, whether, after the assignment and after such presentation and allowance, and while the estate was unsettled, Smith could maintain an action against the assignor upon the original claim. This question was decided in the affirmative in the recent case of Limbocker v. Higinbotham, 52 Kas. 696; 35 Pac. Rep. 783. Following that case, the judgment in this must be reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 P. 336, 53 Kan. 250, 1894 Kan. LEXIS 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-higinbotham-kan-1894.