Smith v. Hightower
51 S.E. 28, 123 Ga. 110, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 389
Opinion
This case falls within the rule, repeatedly announced by this court, that where it does not affirmatively appear that the verdict was demanded under the law and the evidence, the first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed, though based on a specified ground of the motion, whether such ground was meritorious or not. Elliott v. McCalla, ante, 26.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Hightower, 51 S.E. 28, 123 Ga. 110, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 389 (Ga. 1905).
51 S.E. 28 (Smith v. Hightower) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Freeman v. Franklin
170 S.E. 321 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Griffith v. Sellers
153 S.E. 359 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Cox v. Grady
64 S.E. 262 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Atlantic & Birmingham Railway Co. v. Cobb
53 S.E. 591 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)