Smith v. Hightower
51 S.E. 28, 123 Ga. 110, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 389
This text of 51 S.E. 28 (Smith v. Hightower) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith v. Hightower, 51 S.E. 28, 123 Ga. 110, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 389 (Ga. 1905).
Opinion
This case falls within the rule, repeatedly announced by this court, that where it does not affirmatively appear that the verdict was demanded under the law and the evidence, the first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed, though based on a specified ground of the motion, whether such ground was meritorious or not. Elliott v. McCalla, ante, 26.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Freeman v. Franklin
170 S.E. 321 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Griffith v. Sellers
153 S.E. 359 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Cox v. Grady
64 S.E. 262 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Atlantic & Birmingham Railway Co. v. Cobb
53 S.E. 591 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
51 S.E. 28, 123 Ga. 110, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-hightower-ga-1905.