Smith v. Hickman

118 So. 894, 151 Miss. 757, 1928 Miss. LEXIS 374
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 19, 1928
DocketNo. 27450.
StatusPublished

This text of 118 So. 894 (Smith v. Hickman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Hickman, 118 So. 894, 151 Miss. 757, 1928 Miss. LEXIS 374 (Mich. 1928).

Opinion

Pack, J.

Della Hickman, a singje woman, instituted bastardy proceedings against appellant, alleging that he was the father of a child to which she had given birth. The cause was submitted to a jury, which found against appellant, and awarded a verdict of two thousand one hundred and sixty dollars, recommending that it be paid *758 monthly, upon which verdict judgment was rendered by the court. The child in question was born in October, 1927. Upon the trial, the court admitted testimony, over appellant’s objection, that prosecutrix had formerly given birth to a child in 1925; that appellant was also the father of the other child; and that appellant or his father, for him, had effected a compromise settlement in that matter.

The admission of this testimony is assigned as error. It is a well-established rule that former acts of sexual intercourse in such cases are admitted for the purpose of showing a familiarity between the parties, making the act alleged by the prosecution more probable. 1 Wig-more, section 398. Other error is assigned, but it is without merit.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 So. 894, 151 Miss. 757, 1928 Miss. LEXIS 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-hickman-miss-1928.