Smith v. Heiskell

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Smith v. Heiskell

22 F. Cas. 560, 1 Cranch 99

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedNovember 15, 1802

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 22 F. Cas. 560 (Smith v. Heiskell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Heiskell, 22 F. Cas. 560, 1 Cranch 99 (circtddc 1802).

Pincite

Opinion

Trover for Franklin stoves fixed in the fireplaces of the house winch the defendant purchased of the plaintiff. They were fixed In the usual manner with bricks and mortar. The jury found that when the plaintiff sold the bouse to the defendant, he expected to be paid for the stoves in addition to the price of the house. The cases cited were, Lawton v. Lawton, 3 Atk. 13; 2 Bac. Abr. (Gwillim’s ’Ed.) 420.

Judgment for the defendant, it being a ease between vendor and vendee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trover for Franklin stoves fixed in the fireplaces of the house winch the defendant purchased of the plaintiff. They were fixed In the usual manner with bricks and mortar. The jury found that when the plaintiff sold the bouse to the defendant, he expected to be paid for the stoves in addition to the price of the house. The cases cited were, Lawton v. Lawton, 3 Atk. 13; 2 Bac. Abr. (Gwillim’s ’Ed.) 420.

Judgment for the defendant, it being a ease between vendor and vendee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 F. Cas. 560, 1 Cranch 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-heiskell-circtddc-1802.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack