Smith v. Heiskell

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Smith v. Heiskell

22 F. Cas. 560, 1 Cranch 99

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided November 15, 1802·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Trover for Franklin stoves fixed in the fireplaces of the house winch the defendant purchased of the plaintiff. They were fixed In the usual manner with bricks and mortar. The jury found that when the plaintiff sold the bouse to the defendant, he expected to be paid for the stoves in addition to the price of the house. The cases cited were, Lawton v. Lawton, 3 Atk. 13; 2 Bac. Abr. (Gwillim’s ’Ed.) 420.

Judgment for the defendant, it being a ease between vendor and vendee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trover for Franklin stoves fixed in the fireplaces of the house winch the defendant purchased of the plaintiff. They were fixed In the usual manner with bricks and mortar. The jury found that when the plaintiff sold the bouse to the defendant, he expected to be paid for the stoves in addition to the price of the house. The cases cited were, Lawton v. Lawton, 3 Atk. 13; 2 Bac. Abr. (Gwillim’s ’Ed.) 420.

Judgment for the defendant, it being a ease between vendor and vendee.

Smith v. Heiskell, 22 F. Cas. 560, 1 Cranch 99 (circtddc 1802).

Pincite

22 F. Cas. 560 (Smith v. Heiskell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related