Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Smith v. Hartford Casualty Insurance

Smith v. Hartford Casualty Insurance

770 So. 2d 699, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11894
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 20, 2000
DocketNos. 4D99-1796, 4D99-3513
StatusPublished

This text of 770 So. 2d 699 (Smith v. Hartford Casualty Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Hartford Casualty Insurance, 770 So. 2d 699, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11894 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In case number 4D99-1796, we reverse and remand for entry of judgment for Hartford Casualty Insurance Company on authority of Dealers Acceptance Corp. v. United Pacific Ins. Co., 763 So.2d 528 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). The appeal in case number 4D99-3513 is rendered moot by this decision.

REVERSE AND REMAND.

WARNER, C.J., TAYLOR, J., and LENDERMAN, JOHN C„ Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dealers Acceptance Corp. v. United Pacific Ins. Co.
763 So. 2d 528 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
770 So. 2d 699, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-hartford-casualty-insurance-fladistctapp-2000.