Smith v. Hall

1911 OK 109, 114 P. 608, 28 Okla. 435, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 117
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided March 21, 1911·No. 2338·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an original action filed in this court by relator, who is contesting the right of respondent to the office of county judge of Delaware county. A motion has been lodged seeking’ the dismissal of the action, because the same does not involve matters publici juris and is brought by a private relator, and that no showing has been made that the relief demanded could not be adequately secured by bringing the action in the district court of the district in which this county lies.

On the authority of Homesteaders v. McCombs, 24 Okla. 201, 103 Pac. 691, and State ex rel. v. Cobb, County Judge, 24 Okla. 662, 104 Pac. 361, 24 L. R. A. (N. S.) 639, the motion of counsel for respondent must be sustained, and the action is accordingly dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Hall, 1911 OK 109, 114 P. 608, 28 Okla. 435, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 117 (Okla. 1911).

1911 OK 109 (Smith v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jarman v. Mason
1924 OK 722 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)
State v. Ross
1919 OK 257 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1919)
State Ex Rel. Freellng v. McCullough
1917 OK 473 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1917)