Smith v. Halk

1 Georgia Decisions 164
CourtCobb County Superior Court, Ga.
DecidedMarch 15, 1843
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Georgia Decisions 164 (Smith v. Halk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Cobb County Superior Court, Ga. primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Halk, 1 Georgia Decisions 164 (Ga. Super. Ct. 1843).

Opinion

The error, complained of in this caso, is that an action was commenced, fay the plaintiff, on a promissory note, and that the defendant filed a plea of payment, of twelve dollars and seventy-five cents, and that ho introduced no evidence, to support his said plea, except his own oath, which was objected to, but which was admitted by the Court, and the Jury found a verdict for the defendant, for the sum of nine dollars and seventy-two cents. I am of opinion that the Court erred, in permitting the defendant to support and establish his plea of payment, by his own oath : the fact of payment being such a fact, as should be proven, by other evidence, and not by the oath of the party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Georgia Decisions 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-halk-gasuperctcobb-1843.