Smith v. Hadley

7 A. 115, 64 N.H. 97
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 5, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 7 A. 115 (Smith v. Hadley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Hadley, 7 A. 115, 64 N.H. 97 (N.H. 1886).

Opinion

Carpenter, J.

The administrator has no interest in the case, and is not a proper party. The bill may be amended by substituting in his place as plaintiff any one of the defendants, and thereupon there will be a

Decree for the plaintiff.

Bingham, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hatch v. Rideout
65 A.2d 702 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1949)
State Ex Rel. Thorndike v. Collins
36 A. 550 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 A. 115, 64 N.H. 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-hadley-nh-1886.