Home/Supreme Court of New Hampshire/Smith v. Hadley

Smith v. Hadley

7 A. 115, 64 N.H. 97
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1886·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Carpenter, J.

The administrator has no interest in the case, and is not a proper party. The bill may be amended by substituting in his place as plaintiff any one of the defendants, and thereupon there will be a

Decree for the plaintiff.

Bingham, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Hadley, 7 A. 115, 64 N.H. 97 (N.H. 1886).

7 A. 115 (Smith v. Hadley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hatch v. Rideout
65 A.2d 702 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1949)
State Ex Rel. Thorndike v. Collins
36 A. 550 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1894)