Smith v. Guardianship of Estelle Knox

751 So. 2d 763, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2008, 2000 WL 227949
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 1, 2000·No. No. 3D99-1675·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Valerie Smith (“Smith”) appeals a fee reduction for services rendered as limited co-guardian claiming the fee reduction was an abuse of discretion. We agree and reverse.

On two prior occasions, Smith filed a petition for fees based on the same services she performed in this appeal. On both prior occasions, the lower court awarded fees for these services. We find it was an abuse of discretion for the lower court to arbitrarily reduce Smith’s fees to approximately one-third of her prior compensation for the same or similar services. See Holman v. Guardianship of Ferber, 528 So.2d 987 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). In order to prevent this problem from recurring, we instruct the lower court to hold a status conference to determine what future services will be compensated.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Guardianship of Estelle Knox, 751 So. 2d 763, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2008, 2000 WL 227949 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

751 So. 2d 763 (Smith v. Guardianship of Estelle Knox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schacter v. Guardianship of Schacter
756 So. 2d 1075 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)