Smith v. Grundfos Pumps Manufacturing Corporation

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedAugust 9, 2021
Docket1:21-cv-00376
StatusUnknown

This text of Smith v. Grundfos Pumps Manufacturing Corporation (Smith v. Grundfos Pumps Manufacturing Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Grundfos Pumps Manufacturing Corporation, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Opinion

1 BBeevviinn .PAilkleen@ Pciakpes t(oSnBeNla w22y1e9rs3.6co) m 2 Daniel Jonathan (SBN 262209) Daniel.Jonathan@capstonelawyers.com 3 Trisha K. Monesi (SBN 303512) Trisha.Monesi@capstonelawyers.com Capstone Law APC 4 1875 Century Park East, Suite 1000 Los Angeles, California 90067 5 Telephone: (310) 556-4811 Facsímile: (310) 943-0396 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Ryan Smith 7 Michael J. Nader, SBN 200425 8 michael.nader@ogletreedeakins.com Paul M. Smith, SBN 306644 paul.smith@ogletree.com 9 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. 10 500 Capitol Mall, Suite 2500 Sacramento, CA 95814 11 Tel.: 916-840-3150 / Fax: 916-840-3159 Attorneys for Defendants Grundfos Pumps 12 Manufacturing Corp.; Grundfos Americas Corp.; Grundfos CBS, Inc.; Grundfos Pumps Corp.; and Grundfos 13 US Holding Corp.

14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 FRESNO DIVISION 17 RYAN SMITH, individually, and on behalf Case No. 1:21-cv-00376-AWI-EPG of other members of the general public 18 similarly situated, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 19 Plaintiff, (ECF No. 12) 20 v. Trial Date: TBD 21 GRUNDFOS PUMPS MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, a 22 California corporation; GRUNDFOS AMERICAS CORPORATION, a California 23 corporation; GRUNDFOS CBS, INC. , a Delaware corporation; GRUNDFOS PUMPS 24 CORPORATION, a California corporation; GRUNDFOS US HOLDING 25 CORPORATION, a California corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 26

Defendants. 27 RECITALS & GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 28 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiff RYAN SMITH (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants GRUNDFOS PUMPS 2 MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, GRUNDFOS AMERICAS CORPORATION, GRUNDFOS 3 CBS, INC., GRUNDFOS PUMPS CORPORATION, and GRUNDFOS US HOLDING 4 CORPORATION (collectively “Defendants”) (all referred to as the “Parties”) in the above-captioned 5 action (the “Action”) have agreed that, pursuant to the guidance provided by the Court in its initial 6 denial of preliminary approval of the Parties’ settlement of this Action, Defendants will provide the 7 names and contact information of a sample of former employees in the putative class, which involves 8 the disclosure of confidential and private contact information of former employees (“Contact 9 Information”); 10 WHEREAS, such Contact Information is protected from public disclosure under state 11 or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law; 12 WHEREAS, the unauthorized public disclosure of such Contact Information may result 13 in significant and unwarranted harm to the Parties and/or third parties; 14 WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to produce such Contact Information only on the 15 agreement that such information will be disclosed only as provided in this Stipulated Protective Order 16 (the “Order” or “Protective Order”) or as otherwise ordered by the Court; 17 WHEREAS, the Parties further wish to ensure that the Contact Information is protected 18 from disclosure, kept confidential, and used only for purposes appropriate to this litigation, as well as 19 to require appropriate ground rules for such contact; 20 WHEREAS, the Parties therefore agree that to ensure that the Contact Information is 21 adequately protected, the Parties choose to follow the notice process sanctioned by Federal District 22 Court, Central District of California in York v. Starbucks Corp., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92274, *4-5, 23 2009 WL 3177605 (C.D. Cal. June 30, 2009); 24 WHEREAS, because the purpose of this Order is to protect the Contact Information, 25 the Parties agree they are bound as follows from and after the date their counsel have signed it, even 26 if such execution occurs prior to Court approval. 27 THEREFORE, the Parties seek the entry of the Order governing the disclosure of the 28 Contact Information to be designated as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” on the terms 1 set forth below, as well as an Order, governing the return of inadvertently produced Contact 2 Information and affording the Contact Information the protections on the terms set forth below. 3 THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 4 1. DEFINITIONS 5 a. “Contact Information”: The names and personal contact information of a 6 sample of former employees of Defendants who are also putative class members in this Action. 7 Further, Contact Information is information for which disclosure is likely to have the effect of causing 8 harm to either Party, or person from whom the information was obtained, or to the Parties’ or third- 9 parties’ privacy. Contact Information also includes private information pertaining to Defendants’ 10 employees, for which the Parties or any third party have a duty to maintain confidentially. 11 b. Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel and House Counsel (as well as 12 their support staffs). 13 c. Designating Party: a Party that designates information or items that it produces 14 in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ 15 Eyes Only.” 16 d. Disclosures or Discovery Material: all Contact Information produced or 17 generated in disclosures or responses to another party in this matter. 18 e. Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent 19 to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its Counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 20 consultant in this action and who is not a past or a current employee of a Party or of a competitor of a 21 Party and who, at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party or a 22 competitor of a Party. This definition includes a professional jury or trial consultant retained in 23 connection with this litigation. 24 f. “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” Information or Items: extremely 25 sensitive “Confidential” Information or Items whose disclosure to another Party or nonparty would 26 create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive means, especially 27 the Contact Information defined herein. 28 g. House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party. 1 h. Outside Counsel: attorneys who are not employees of a Party but who are 2 retained to represent or advise a Party in this action. 3 i. Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 4 agents, consultants, retained experts, House and Outside counsel (and their support staff). 5 j. Producing Party: a Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this 6 action. 7 k. Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 8 (e.g., photocopying; videotaping; translating; preparing exhibits or demonstrations; organizing, 9 storing, retrieving data in any form or medium; etc.) and their employees and subcontractors. 10 l. Protected Material: Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 11 “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” pursuant to this Order. 12 m. Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 13 Producing Party in this action. 14 2. SCOPE 15 The protections conferred by this Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined 16 above), but also any information copied or extracted therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, 17 summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or 18 Counsel to or in Court or in other settings that might reveal Protected Material. 19 3. DURATION 20 Even after the termination of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by 21 this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a Court order 22 otherwise directs. 23 4. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 24 a. Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each 25 Party or non-party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care 26 to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under appropriate standards.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Smith v. Grundfos Pumps Manufacturing Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-grundfos-pumps-manufacturing-corporation-caed-2021.