Smith v. Green

Supreme Court of Georgia

Smith v. Green

57 S.E. 98, 128 Ga. 90, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 38

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 11, 1907

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 57 S.E. 98 (Smith v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Green, 57 S.E. 98, 128 Ga. 90, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 38 (Ga. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Evans, J.

1. An affidavit for a distress warrant, which alleges that the tenant “is removing- his crops from the premises so rented, whereby-said rent is now due and unpaid,” sufficiently complies with the Civil Code, § 3124, which authorizes the landlord to distrain as soon as the rent is due, or before due, if the tenant is seeking to remove his goods from the premises.

2.. Where the rent contract is in writing, parol evidence is inadmissible to add to or vary its terms.

3. A tenant may prove that the landlord has violated the rent contract, and reduce the rent by so much as the damages occasioned thereby amount to, without filing -other pleadings than the statutory affidavit. Johnston v. Patterson, 80 Ga. 725. If complaint is made of the exclusion of evidence on which the tenant relies to establish his recoupment, the assignment of error must present so much of the excluded evidence as will show that the landlord has violated his obligations under the contract, to the tenant’s damage. When the rejected evidence is- not thus fully stated, this court is unable to say that its exclusion was erroneous.

4. Damages flowing from an independent tort of the landlord upon the tenant can not be set off against rent.

5. The right of the landlord to recover a given amount being established by the undisputed evidence, a direction of a verdict in his favor was proper.

Judgment affirmed.

Fish, O. J., absent. The other Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evans, J.

1. An affidavit for a distress warrant, which alleges that the tenant “is removing- his crops from the premises so rented, whereby-said rent is now due and unpaid,” sufficiently complies with the Civil Code, § 3124, which authorizes the landlord to distrain as soon as the rent is due, or before due, if the tenant is seeking to remove his goods from the premises.

2.. Where the rent contract is in writing, parol evidence is inadmissible to add to or vary its terms.

3. A tenant may prove that the landlord has violated the rent contract, and reduce the rent by so much as the damages occasioned thereby amount to, without filing -other pleadings than the statutory affidavit. Johnston v. Patterson, 80 Ga. 725. If complaint is made of the exclusion of evidence on which the tenant relies to establish his recoupment, the assignment of error must present so much of the excluded evidence as will show that the landlord has violated his obligations under the contract, to the tenant’s damage. When the rejected evidence is- not thus fully stated, this court is unable to say that its exclusion was erroneous.

4. Damages flowing from an independent tort of the landlord upon the tenant can not be set off against rent.

5. The right of the landlord to recover a given amount being established by the undisputed evidence, a direction of a verdict in his favor was proper.

Judgment affirmed.

Fish, O. J., absent. The other Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 S.E. 98, 128 Ga. 90, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-green-ga-1907.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack