Smith v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Smith v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

416 So. 2d 381

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided July 1, 1982·No. No. 82-317·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

DOUCET, Judge.

WRIT GRANTED AND MADE PEREMPTORY. For the reasons in Number 82-^275: Daniel Patrick Briggs v. United Services Automobile Association, 416 So.2d 377, it is hereby ordered, that applicant’s cost paid under protest in the sum of $250.00, be refunded and the Local Rule XIII(D) of the Ninth Judicial District Court, as amended, is herein found to be invalid and unenforceable as being contrary to LSA-R.S. 13:3050.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOUCET, Judge.

WRIT GRANTED AND MADE PEREMPTORY. For the reasons in Number 82-^275: Daniel Patrick Briggs v. United Services Automobile Association, 416 So.2d 377, it is hereby ordered, that applicant’s cost paid under protest in the sum of $250.00, be refunded and the Local Rule XIII(D) of the Ninth Judicial District Court, as amended, is herein found to be invalid and unenforceable as being contrary to LSA-R.S. 13:3050.

Smith v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 416 So. 2d 381 (La. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

416 So. 2d 381 (Smith v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related