Smith v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Smith v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

416 So. 2d 381

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJuly 1, 1982

DocketNo. 82-317

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 416 So. 2d 381 (Smith v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 416 So. 2d 381 (La. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

DOUCET, Judge.

WRIT GRANTED AND MADE PEREMPTORY. For the reasons in Number 82-^275: Daniel Patrick Briggs v. United Services Automobile Association, 416 So.2d 377, it is hereby ordered, that applicant’s cost paid under protest in the sum of $250.00, be refunded and the Local Rule XIII(D) of the Ninth Judicial District Court, as amended, is herein found to be invalid and unenforceable as being contrary to LSA-R.S. 13:3050.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOUCET, Judge.

WRIT GRANTED AND MADE PEREMPTORY. For the reasons in Number 82-^275: Daniel Patrick Briggs v. United Services Automobile Association, 416 So.2d 377, it is hereby ordered, that applicant’s cost paid under protest in the sum of $250.00, be refunded and the Local Rule XIII(D) of the Ninth Judicial District Court, as amended, is herein found to be invalid and unenforceable as being contrary to LSA-R.S. 13:3050.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

416 So. 2d 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-great-atlantic-pacific-tea-co-lactapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack